Crystal Cox asks for a Retraction and Change of Facts
"Regarding this statement in your article. " there was evidence that she had a history of making similar allegations against other companies and seeking payoffs in exchange for retraction. "
You have distorted the facts in this matter, the ruling said "apparently" and there is NO EVIDENCE anywhere that I had a history of this action, PERIOD."
Haynes and Boone, IMMEDIATLEY eMails this
"We have taken down the article in question. It is part of an internal newsletter but will be published down the line. In consulting with Nick on your complaint, we will change that paragraph to read:
"Cox was not a professional journalist, and the appeals court would later note, citing to a New York Times column about Cox, that she “apparently had a history of making similar allegations and seeking payoffs in exchange for retraction.” (Cox has since asked the court to amend its opinion to remove this statement, which Cox says is not supported by adjudicated evidence and is not an accurate representation of the New York Times column.)"
Here is New Article,
More on Cox asking the Court to Amend
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkib1NraEFFb1Rac2M/edit
Here is New Article,
More on Cox asking the Court to Amend
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkib1NraEFFb1Rac2M/edit